<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>MAT - Minimum Alternative Tax - Method of computation of depreciation for the purpose of Book Profit - Settled position once again unsettled awaiting the final decision of Larger Bench of Apex Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=1094</link>
    <description>Whether depreciation for computing Book Profit under MAT is governed by Companies Act rates or may reflect higher audited amounts is contested. Earlier rulings held that when depreciation debited in audited profit and loss accounts is certified by auditors, the Assessing Officer may only make specified explanatory adjustments and cannot recalculate depreciation using Company Act rates. A later bench found that precedent incorrect and referred the issue to a Larger Bench to decide whether Companies Act rates are minimum, whether taxpayers may claim higher depreciation for book profit, and whether an AO can substitute Company Act rates despite audited accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:29:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=303852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>MAT - Minimum Alternative Tax - Method of computation of depreciation for the purpose of Book Profit - Settled position once again unsettled awaiting the final decision of Larger Bench of Apex Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=1094</link>
      <description>Whether depreciation for computing Book Profit under MAT is governed by Companies Act rates or may reflect higher audited amounts is contested. Earlier rulings held that when depreciation debited in audited profit and loss accounts is certified by auditors, the Assessing Officer may only make specified explanatory adjustments and cannot recalculate depreciation using Company Act rates. A later bench found that precedent incorrect and referred the issue to a Larger Bench to decide whether Companies Act rates are minimum, whether taxpayers may claim higher depreciation for book profit, and whether an AO can substitute Company Act rates despite audited accounts.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:29:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=1094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>