<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>17 FDI proposals approved</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=1048</link>
    <description>Seventeen FDI proposals were approved across sectors for equity issuances, warrants, joint ventures, expansions and scheme based allotments, with some approvals involving no fresh inflow and others subject to policy constraints such as Press Note 1 of 2005. Twelve proposals were deferred due to sectoral sensitivities including retail single brand, insurance, defence manufacturing, telecom share transfers and structural conversions. Five proposals were rejected for involving non cash consideration or impermissible issuance mechanisms; two proposals were noted as court sanctioned mergers/demergers, and two high value proposals were referred to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs for clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:12:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=303806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>17 FDI proposals approved</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=1048</link>
      <description>Seventeen FDI proposals were approved across sectors for equity issuances, warrants, joint ventures, expansions and scheme based allotments, with some approvals involving no fresh inflow and others subject to policy constraints such as Press Note 1 of 2005. Twelve proposals were deferred due to sectoral sensitivities including retail single brand, insurance, defence manufacturing, telecom share transfers and structural conversions. Five proposals were rejected for involving non cash consideration or impermissible issuance mechanisms; two proposals were noted as court sanctioned mergers/demergers, and two high value proposals were referred to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs for clearance.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:12:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=1048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>