<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Judgments in the matters of Mcdowell &amp; Co. Ltd.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=862</link>
    <description>Allowability of technical service charges under a later commercial agreement was sustained as not a subterfuge; depreciation claims for R&amp;D assets were remanded for factual determination of actual use and nexus; furnishing a bank guarantee was held not to constitute actual payment under Section 43B; capital versus revenue treatment of expenditure on a replacement transformer was remitted for factual inquiry by the assessing officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:39:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=303621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Judgments in the matters of Mcdowell &amp; Co. Ltd.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=862</link>
      <description>Allowability of technical service charges under a later commercial agreement was sustained as not a subterfuge; depreciation claims for R&amp;D assets were remanded for factual determination of actual use and nexus; furnishing a bank guarantee was held not to constitute actual payment under Section 43B; capital versus revenue treatment of expenditure on a replacement transformer was remitted for factual inquiry by the assessing officer.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:39:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>