<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SSI Exemption under central excise with clearance under brand name - trade name of others and stand taken by CBEC - Notification No. 8/2003 C.E.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=755</link>
    <description>Amendments permit SSI units to clear specified packing materials bearing another&#039;s brand name, now including plastic bags, and to avail Cenvat credit on inputs for those dutiable clearances; CBEC had issued a circular citing a Supreme Court decision against simultaneous credit and exemption while a tribunal decision supported permissibility and an appeal was pending, and the amendment effectively allows concurrent benefit. A remaining compliance issue is that turnover for SSI threshold is calculated after excluding values of dutiable branded clearances, creating potential disputes if departments challenge such deductions, prompting a call for CBEC clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:46:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=303514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SSI Exemption under central excise with clearance under brand name - trade name of others and stand taken by CBEC - Notification No. 8/2003 C.E.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=755</link>
      <description>Amendments permit SSI units to clear specified packing materials bearing another&#039;s brand name, now including plastic bags, and to avail Cenvat credit on inputs for those dutiable clearances; CBEC had issued a circular citing a Supreme Court decision against simultaneous credit and exemption while a tribunal decision supported permissibility and an appeal was pending, and the amendment effectively allows concurrent benefit. A remaining compliance issue is that turnover for SSI threshold is calculated after excluding values of dutiable branded clearances, creating potential disputes if departments challenge such deductions, prompting a call for CBEC clarification.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:46:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>