<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Whether reimbursement of expenses is not subject to service tax?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=620</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that reimbursement of expenses received from a principal bank does not attract service tax and that the Commissioner&#039;s demand for differential service tax on such reimbursements in respect of Business Auxiliary Service was unsustainable; the department has appealed the tribunal&#039;s order to the Supreme Court because the transactions predated the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 and the ruling has broader valuation consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:29:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=303379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Whether reimbursement of expenses is not subject to service tax?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=620</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that reimbursement of expenses received from a principal bank does not attract service tax and that the Commissioner&#039;s demand for differential service tax on such reimbursements in respect of Business Auxiliary Service was unsustainable; the department has appealed the tribunal&#039;s order to the Supreme Court because the transactions predated the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 and the ruling has broader valuation consequences.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:29:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>