<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee did not file the return within due date, did not comply with the notice issued u/s 142(1) and still won the case against income escaping assessment</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=399</link>
    <description>A later re-assessment notice is invalid if the assessing officer previously initiated assessment proceedings by issuing an initial notice calling for a return and the reassessment machinery was thereby set in motion but remained uncompleted and its statutory period expired; a fresh notice cannot revive those lapsed proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:58:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=303172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee did not file the return within due date, did not comply with the notice issued u/s 142(1) and still won the case against income escaping assessment</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=399</link>
      <description>A later re-assessment notice is invalid if the assessing officer previously initiated assessment proceedings by issuing an initial notice calling for a return and the reassessment machinery was thereby set in motion but remained uncompleted and its statutory period expired; a fresh notice cannot revive those lapsed proceedings.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:58:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>