https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=69 The Supreme Court in K. Raheja held developer construction done for and on behalf of purchasers is a works contract liable to sales tax, prompting administrative clarifications; the Allahabad High Court in Assotech reached the contrary finding because the developer there did not construct for or on behalf of prospective allottees, creating divergent tax characterisations. en-us Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:41:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Aug 2025 17:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=69 The Supreme Court in K. Raheja held developer construction done for and on behalf of purchasers is a works contract liable to sales tax, prompting administrative clarifications; the Allahabad High Court in Assotech reached the contrary finding because the developer there did not construct for or on behalf of prospective allottees, creating divergent tax characterisations. News - Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:41:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=69