<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Whether the slitting and cutting of duty paid plastic laminated films into smaller rolls amounts to manufacture so as to result in ‘goods’ liable to excise duty</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=63</link>
    <description>After considering authorities and earlier ambiguity, the Larger Bench held that mere slitting and cutting of duty-paid plastic laminated jumbo rolls into smaller rolls does not amount to manufacturing and therefore does not attract excise duty on the resultant slit rolls.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:41:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Whether the slitting and cutting of duty paid plastic laminated films into smaller rolls amounts to manufacture so as to result in ‘goods’ liable to excise duty</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=63</link>
      <description>After considering authorities and earlier ambiguity, the Larger Bench held that mere slitting and cutting of duty-paid plastic laminated jumbo rolls into smaller rolls does not amount to manufacturing and therefore does not attract excise duty on the resultant slit rolls.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:41:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=63</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>