<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>WINDING UP OF A COMPANY FOR NON PAYMENT OF SERVICE TAX</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5249</link>
    <description>Winding up under Section 433(e) and Section 434 requires a crystallised, due and payable debt at the date of statutory demand and filing. Absent a specific contractual allocation or an admission, contested or unagreed service tax liabilities-being indirect taxes whose incidence can be allocated by agreement-do not ordinarily constitute a debt &quot;due and payable&quot; sufficient to support winding up proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:53:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>WINDING UP OF A COMPANY FOR NON PAYMENT OF SERVICE TAX</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5249</link>
      <description>Winding up under Section 433(e) and Section 434 requires a crystallised, due and payable debt at the date of statutory demand and filing. Absent a specific contractual allocation or an admission, contested or unagreed service tax liabilities-being indirect taxes whose incidence can be allocated by agreement-do not ordinarily constitute a debt &quot;due and payable&quot; sufficient to support winding up proceedings.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:53:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>