<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>INVOKING THE DOCTRINE OF ‘per incuriam’</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5220</link>
    <description>The Tribunal applied the doctrine of per incuriam where an earlier High Court decision failed to consider the statutory rule that CENVAT credit is taken upon receipt of inputs, input services and capital goods; that oversight produced an interpretation that would nullify the statutory interest mechanism on reversal of inadmissible credit, and therefore the High Court ruling could be treated as per incuriam.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:28:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:28:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>INVOKING THE DOCTRINE OF ‘per incuriam’</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5220</link>
      <description>The Tribunal applied the doctrine of per incuriam where an earlier High Court decision failed to consider the statutory rule that CENVAT credit is taken upon receipt of inputs, input services and capital goods; that oversight produced an interpretation that would nullify the statutory interest mechanism on reversal of inadmissible credit, and therefore the High Court ruling could be treated as per incuriam.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:28:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>