<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>BUSINESS LOSS SECTION 73 EXPL. DELHI HIGH COURT DERIVATIVES</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5201</link>
    <description>The statutory framework separates business income into normal and speculative business where a business income explanation deems speculative transactions a distinct business; exceptions to the definition of speculative transactions treat specified hedging and qualified derivative trades as non speculative, making their results eligible for general set off and carry forward. By contrast, a speculative loss deeming provision treats certain share trading losses as speculative for limited carry forward purposes. The author argues a recent high court judgment treated derivatives as equivalent to shares without adequately addressing the business income explanation or the general carry forward mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:16:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:16:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>BUSINESS LOSS SECTION 73 EXPL. DELHI HIGH COURT DERIVATIVES</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5201</link>
      <description>The statutory framework separates business income into normal and speculative business where a business income explanation deems speculative transactions a distinct business; exceptions to the definition of speculative transactions treat specified hedging and qualified derivative trades as non speculative, making their results eligible for general set off and carry forward. By contrast, a speculative loss deeming provision treats certain share trading losses as speculative for limited carry forward purposes. The author argues a recent high court judgment treated derivatives as equivalent to shares without adequately addressing the business income explanation or the general carry forward mechanism.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:16:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>