<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 115J, 115JA and 115JB may be ultravirse the Constitution of India and the Income-tax Act,1961 - a study with reference to some very weekly prepared and contested cases about validity of provision for tax on book profit / minimum alternate tax (MAT) and some suggestions for tax payers and government both</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5186</link>
    <description>The article contends that levies under Sections 115J, 115JA and 115JB are constitutionally and statutorily suspect because amounts collected are provisional and creditable and thus not a final tax on income; book profit as shown in accounts is not equivalent to taxable income or defined excess profit; and differing permitted accounting policies among companies produce discriminatory tax outcomes. The author urges more focused litigation and calls for statutory uniform accounting standards if tax on book profit is to be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:22:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 115J, 115JA and 115JB may be ultravirse the Constitution of India and the Income-tax Act,1961 - a study with reference to some very weekly prepared and contested cases about validity of provision for tax on book profit / minimum alternate tax (MAT) and some suggestions for tax payers and government both</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5186</link>
      <description>The article contends that levies under Sections 115J, 115JA and 115JB are constitutionally and statutorily suspect because amounts collected are provisional and creditable and thus not a final tax on income; book profit as shown in accounts is not equivalent to taxable income or defined excess profit; and differing permitted accounting policies among companies produce discriminatory tax outcomes. The author urges more focused litigation and calls for statutory uniform accounting standards if tax on book profit is to be sustained.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:22:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>