<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>MOST PREFERRED VIEW CAN BE ADOPTEDFOR EXPEDITIOUS JUSTICE- LARGER BENCHES GENERALLY CAUSE DELAY IN JUSTICE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5161</link>
    <description>Adopt the most popular view of judges to resolve recurring legal issues and avoid constituting third member or larger/special benches, thereby reducing delay and pendency. Implement qualifying thresholds for recognition of a prevailing view based on the largest number of judges or members (on zonal or all India basis), establish procedures to collect and assimilate judgments, and provide exceptions where judges are nearly equally divided or a larger bench is warranted. Recommend legislative or procedural amendment to institutionalize this approach while preserving appellate review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:30:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:12:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>MOST PREFERRED VIEW CAN BE ADOPTEDFOR EXPEDITIOUS JUSTICE- LARGER BENCHES GENERALLY CAUSE DELAY IN JUSTICE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5161</link>
      <description>Adopt the most popular view of judges to resolve recurring legal issues and avoid constituting third member or larger/special benches, thereby reducing delay and pendency. Implement qualifying thresholds for recognition of a prevailing view based on the largest number of judges or members (on zonal or all India basis), establish procedures to collect and assimilate judgments, and provide exceptions where judges are nearly equally divided or a larger bench is warranted. Recommend legislative or procedural amendment to institutionalize this approach while preserving appellate review.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:30:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>