https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5150 The petition alleged harassment, unspecified illegal demands and prejudiced orders by two tribunal members and sought to restrain them from discharging statutory functions and to compel the tribunal president to decide a representation. The court found no particulars or corroborating evidence, emphasised that restraining a statutory authority requires a factual threshold be met, and characterised unsupported allegations as an abuse of process, cautioning that complaints must be supported by concrete evidence and specific instances of improper conduct. en-us Thu, 30 May 2013 05:40:15 +0530 Thu, 30 May 2013 05:40:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5150 The petition alleged harassment, unspecified illegal demands and prejudiced orders by two tribunal members and sought to restrain them from discharging statutory functions and to compel the tribunal president to decide a representation. The court found no particulars or corroborating evidence, emphasised that restraining a statutory authority requires a factual threshold be met, and characterised unsupported allegations as an abuse of process, cautioning that complaints must be supported by concrete evidence and specific instances of improper conduct. Articles Income Tax Thu, 30 May 2013 05:40:15 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5150