<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CEILING ON STAY PERIOD: JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED!!!</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=2074</link>
    <description>The amendment to section 35C(2A) imposes a statutory ceiling on Tribunal stay orders by allowing extension only on application and upon satisfaction that delay is not attributable to the applicant, and by providing that where an appeal is not disposed of within the total permitted period the stay shall on expiry stand vacated, thereby limiting the Tribunal&#039;s ability to maintain stays beyond the prescribed aggregate timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:10:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:10:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CEILING ON STAY PERIOD: JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED!!!</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=2074</link>
      <description>The amendment to section 35C(2A) imposes a statutory ceiling on Tribunal stay orders by allowing extension only on application and upon satisfaction that delay is not attributable to the applicant, and by providing that where an appeal is not disposed of within the total permitted period the stay shall on expiry stand vacated, thereby limiting the Tribunal&#039;s ability to maintain stays beyond the prescribed aggregate timeframe.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:10:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=2074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>