<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SECTION 73(2A) : REVENUE TO FOLLOW “SOMETHING IS BETTER THAN NOTHING”</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=2065</link>
    <description>Proposed Section 73(2A) mandates that when extended-period notices based on fraud, collusion, suppression or intent to evade are held unsustainable, the Central Excise officer must re-quantify and determine service tax payable for the ordinary limitation period of eighteen months, thereby preserving a re-assessed demand even if the extended-period invocation is disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:59:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:59:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SECTION 73(2A) : REVENUE TO FOLLOW “SOMETHING IS BETTER THAN NOTHING”</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=2065</link>
      <description>Proposed Section 73(2A) mandates that when extended-period notices based on fraud, collusion, suppression or intent to evade are held unsustainable, the Central Excise officer must re-quantify and determine service tax payable for the ordinary limitation period of eighteen months, thereby preserving a re-assessed demand even if the extended-period invocation is disallowed.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:59:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=2065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>