<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mere non-payment of duties is not collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=2033</link>
    <description>Section 28 separates inadvertent non payment, subject to the short limitation, from deliberate default or mala fide acts, which alone justify invoking the extended limitation; the proviso therefore requires proof of intention to default or positive acts of collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts, and the burden of proving such mala fide conduct lies on the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 07:03:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 07:03:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Mere non-payment of duties is not collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=2033</link>
      <description>Section 28 separates inadvertent non payment, subject to the short limitation, from deliberate default or mala fide acts, which alone justify invoking the extended limitation; the proviso therefore requires proof of intention to default or positive acts of collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts, and the burden of proving such mala fide conduct lies on the revenue.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 07:03:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=2033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>