<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Incentive by way of initial or additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) can be allowed in two years.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1992</link>
    <description>The document analyzes the conflict between the main provision granting a one time initial or additional depreciation allowance on actual cost of qualifying new plant and machinery and a proviso that halves depreciation where assets are used for less than the requisite period, noting two interpretive paths: purposive construction to allow the full incentive in the year of acquisition, or a literal application that limits the first year allowance. It highlights the ITAT decision permitting carry forward of the unallowed balance as unabsorbed depreciation and recommends legislative amendment to clarify that the incentive is separate from written down value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 10:49:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 10:49:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Incentive by way of initial or additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) can be allowed in two years.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1992</link>
      <description>The document analyzes the conflict between the main provision granting a one time initial or additional depreciation allowance on actual cost of qualifying new plant and machinery and a proviso that halves depreciation where assets are used for less than the requisite period, noting two interpretive paths: purposive construction to allow the full incentive in the year of acquisition, or a literal application that limits the first year allowance. It highlights the ITAT decision permitting carry forward of the unallowed balance as unabsorbed depreciation and recommends legislative amendment to clarify that the incentive is separate from written down value.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 10:49:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>