<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>WHETHER THE WIDOW OF AN EMPLOYEE IS ENTITLED TO GET FAMILY PENSION UNDER THE EMPLOYEES FAMILY PENSION SCHEME, 1971 ON THE FAILURE OF THE EMPLOYEE TO EXERCISE HIS OPTION UNDER THE SCHEME?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1980</link>
    <description>Entitlement to family pension under the Employees Family Pension Scheme, 1971 depends on timely exercise of the prescribed option: employees on the cut off date had to file Form I within three months, and later entrants must furnish Form 2. Distribution of the scheme notification, an employee&#039;s non exercise of option together with acceptance of provident fund benefits, and lengthy delay in contesting entitlement are critical facts that can negate a widow&#039;s claim; appellate review addresses whether lower tribunals reasonably appreciated these procedural and documentary circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:20:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:20:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>WHETHER THE WIDOW OF AN EMPLOYEE IS ENTITLED TO GET FAMILY PENSION UNDER THE EMPLOYEES FAMILY PENSION SCHEME, 1971 ON THE FAILURE OF THE EMPLOYEE TO EXERCISE HIS OPTION UNDER THE SCHEME?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1980</link>
      <description>Entitlement to family pension under the Employees Family Pension Scheme, 1971 depends on timely exercise of the prescribed option: employees on the cut off date had to file Form I within three months, and later entrants must furnish Form 2. Distribution of the scheme notification, an employee&#039;s non exercise of option together with acceptance of provident fund benefits, and lengthy delay in contesting entitlement are critical facts that can negate a widow&#039;s claim; appellate review addresses whether lower tribunals reasonably appreciated these procedural and documentary circumstances.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:20:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>