<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>A BANK EMPLOYEE AQUITTED IN APPEALLATE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IS LIABLE TO BE PROCEEDED UNDER CLAUSE 19(3) (d) OF BIPARTITE SETTLEMENT, 1966</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1978</link>
    <description>On acquittal after conviction, management may either reinstate the employee or proceed with internal disciplinary proceedings; an employee deemed reinstated from the original dismissal date may be treated as on duty but under suspension and is entitled to subsistence allowance rather than full pay unless management directs otherwise. Termination following enquiry is limited to payment in lieu of notice, and procedural fairness in the enquiry-opportunity to be heard-is required though non participation can produce ex parte findings sustaining discipline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 06:24:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 06:24:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>A BANK EMPLOYEE AQUITTED IN APPEALLATE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IS LIABLE TO BE PROCEEDED UNDER CLAUSE 19(3) (d) OF BIPARTITE SETTLEMENT, 1966</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1978</link>
      <description>On acquittal after conviction, management may either reinstate the employee or proceed with internal disciplinary proceedings; an employee deemed reinstated from the original dismissal date may be treated as on duty but under suspension and is entitled to subsistence allowance rather than full pay unless management directs otherwise. Termination following enquiry is limited to payment in lieu of notice, and procedural fairness in the enquiry-opportunity to be heard-is required though non participation can produce ex parte findings sustaining discipline.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 06:24:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>