<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Compounding of offences</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1914</link>
    <description>Compounding under the Companies Act, 1956 allows settlement of many corporate offences punishable by fine or by fine and imprisonment where permitted, providing a procedural alternative to litigation. The regime excludes offences attracting custodial sentences and those barred by a prior compounding restriction, and identifies representative compoundable and non compoundable provisions. When compounding is unavailable, directors and officers may face prosecution, arrest and criminal sanctions; arrested persons retain procedural safeguards. The article recommends compliance checklists to avoid penalties and notes companies often elect compounding to avoid economic offence proceedings and collateral regulatory consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:16:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:16:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Compounding of offences</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1914</link>
      <description>Compounding under the Companies Act, 1956 allows settlement of many corporate offences punishable by fine or by fine and imprisonment where permitted, providing a procedural alternative to litigation. The regime excludes offences attracting custodial sentences and those barred by a prior compounding restriction, and identifies representative compoundable and non compoundable provisions. When compounding is unavailable, directors and officers may face prosecution, arrest and criminal sanctions; arrested persons retain procedural safeguards. The article recommends compliance checklists to avoid penalties and notes companies often elect compounding to avoid economic offence proceedings and collateral regulatory consequences.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:16:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>