https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1823 Whether a court may appoint an arbitrator other than a named nominee depends on the balance between party autonomy in appointing arbitrators and the limited statutory grounds for challenge; courts must generally refer disputes to a named arbitrator unless concrete facts create justifiable doubts about the arbitrator's independence or impartiality or show the arbitrator lacks agreed qualifications, in which case judicial appointment of an alternative is permissible to preserve an impartial arbitral process. en-us Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:42:15 +0530 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:42:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1823 Whether a court may appoint an arbitrator other than a named nominee depends on the balance between party autonomy in appointing arbitrators and the limited statutory grounds for challenge; courts must generally refer disputes to a named arbitrator unless concrete facts create justifiable doubts about the arbitrator's independence or impartiality or show the arbitrator lacks agreed qualifications, in which case judicial appointment of an alternative is permissible to preserve an impartial arbitral process. Articles Other Topics Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:42:15 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1823