https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1784 Whether consultant doctors qualify as employees under Section 2(f) depends on factual evidence of subordination, exclusivity, integration and the true character of payments; visiting consultants paid only for services and not subject to hospital control ordinarily fall outside the statutory definition, and the department must produce probative material-statements, payroll and inquiry findings-rather than rely on labels or muster roll signatures. en-us Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:04:39 +0530 Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:04:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1784 Whether consultant doctors qualify as employees under Section 2(f) depends on factual evidence of subordination, exclusivity, integration and the true character of payments; visiting consultants paid only for services and not subject to hospital control ordinarily fall outside the statutory definition, and the department must produce probative material-statements, payroll and inquiry findings-rather than rely on labels or muster roll signatures. Articles Other Topics Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:04:39 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1784