<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unjust and unreasonable amendment vide notification dated 30.03.2012 withdrawing higher rate of depreciation for certain renewable energy machines to be installed on or after 01.04.2012. A request for reconsideration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1688</link>
    <description>The 30 March 2012 amendment inserts an installation cut-off into clauses (l) and (m) of the Appendix, withdrawing the higher rate of depreciation for wind mills and devices running on wind energy installed on or after 1 April 2012; clause (r) (machinery used in manufacture of the listed items) is not amended and remains eligible. The amendment is unexplained, raises concerns of unfair discrimination against wind projects with long gestation, and the author seeks reconsideration and transitional protection for projects under implementation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:46:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:46:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unjust and unreasonable amendment vide notification dated 30.03.2012 withdrawing higher rate of depreciation for certain renewable energy machines to be installed on or after 01.04.2012. A request for reconsideration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1688</link>
      <description>The 30 March 2012 amendment inserts an installation cut-off into clauses (l) and (m) of the Appendix, withdrawing the higher rate of depreciation for wind mills and devices running on wind energy installed on or after 1 April 2012; clause (r) (machinery used in manufacture of the listed items) is not amended and remains eligible. The amendment is unexplained, raises concerns of unfair discrimination against wind projects with long gestation, and the author seeks reconsideration and transitional protection for projects under implementation.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:46:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>