<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Valuation in works contract and other issues requiring more clarity after provision of Reverse charge in Service Tax in Budget 2012</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1681</link>
    <description>Reverse charge shifts partial service tax liability to recipients for specified services; works contract valuation follows a mandatory sequence: total consideration minus property value for VAT, then total minus actual goods value, and only failing those, prescribed abatement percentages apply (40% original works, 60% other contracts, 25% certain pre completion receipts). The sequencing limits abatement to a residual method, creating practical valuation and compliance difficulties for recipients. The proposal permits refunds of unutilized Cenvat for &quot;small providers&quot; but leaves the term and eligibility unclear, complicating refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:56:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:56:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Valuation in works contract and other issues requiring more clarity after provision of Reverse charge in Service Tax in Budget 2012</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1681</link>
      <description>Reverse charge shifts partial service tax liability to recipients for specified services; works contract valuation follows a mandatory sequence: total consideration minus property value for VAT, then total minus actual goods value, and only failing those, prescribed abatement percentages apply (40% original works, 60% other contracts, 25% certain pre completion receipts). The sequencing limits abatement to a residual method, creating practical valuation and compliance difficulties for recipients. The proposal permits refunds of unutilized Cenvat for &quot;small providers&quot; but leaves the term and eligibility unclear, complicating refund claims.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:56:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>