<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reverse Charge Mechanism in service tax-more clarifications in works contract service required</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1675</link>
    <description>The Budget 2012 amendment and Notification dated 17-03-2012 impose a reverse charge mechanism for specified services, shifting tax liability to the service recipient to the extents listed; for works contract service the notification prescribes a 50:50 liability split between contractor and contractee. A practical problem arises when the parties to a single works contract adopt different tax computation schemes (composite versus actual labour and services), creating uncertainty about how the equal apportionment is to be determined and whether contract bifurcation or other criteria should be applied pending further clarification from the tax authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:31:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reverse Charge Mechanism in service tax-more clarifications in works contract service required</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1675</link>
      <description>The Budget 2012 amendment and Notification dated 17-03-2012 impose a reverse charge mechanism for specified services, shifting tax liability to the service recipient to the extents listed; for works contract service the notification prescribes a 50:50 liability split between contractor and contractee. A practical problem arises when the parties to a single works contract adopt different tax computation schemes (composite versus actual labour and services), creating uncertainty about how the equal apportionment is to be determined and whether contract bifurcation or other criteria should be applied pending further clarification from the tax authority.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:31:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>