<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>LAW DOES NOT COMPEL DOING IMPOSSIBILITIES IMPOSSIBILIUM NULLA OBLIGATIO EST</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1615</link>
    <description>The tribunal treated the purchase of land with sale proceeds as the operative investment toward constructing a residential house and, because a court injunction objectively prevented construction within the statutory period, held that the amount spent on land qualified as investment for claiming capital gains exemption, applying the doctrine that law does not compel impossibilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:46:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:46:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>LAW DOES NOT COMPEL DOING IMPOSSIBILITIES IMPOSSIBILIUM NULLA OBLIGATIO EST</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1615</link>
      <description>The tribunal treated the purchase of land with sale proceeds as the operative investment toward constructing a residential house and, because a court injunction objectively prevented construction within the statutory period, held that the amount spent on land qualified as investment for claiming capital gains exemption, applying the doctrine that law does not compel impossibilities.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:46:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>