<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>INTERPRETATION OF TAX STATUTES</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1609</link>
    <description>Taxing statutes must be interpreted strictly: clear and unambiguous statutory language governs and cannot be extended by intendment or equity. Legal fictions are to be construed contextually to serve their object. If wording is ambiguous, the construction consonant with equity may be preferred. Commercial documents must be read as a whole and construed in commercial parlance, with substance prevailing over form for tax characterisation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:21:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:21:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>INTERPRETATION OF TAX STATUTES</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1609</link>
      <description>Taxing statutes must be interpreted strictly: clear and unambiguous statutory language governs and cannot be extended by intendment or equity. Legal fictions are to be construed contextually to serve their object. If wording is ambiguous, the construction consonant with equity may be preferred. Commercial documents must be read as a whole and construed in commercial parlance, with substance prevailing over form for tax characterisation.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Wealth Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:21:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>