<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Peak Credit and telescoping theories in assessment proceedings under Income Tax</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1575</link>
    <description>Peak credit theory allows arranging unexplained credits and debits chronologically and treating later credits as referable to earlier withdrawals so only the peak unexplained amount is assessed; it may extend across accounts if all credits are treated as the assessee&#039;s funds and is rebuttable by material showing withdrawals were sourced elsewhere. Telescoping permits set offs between different types of additions or across years where an unexplained investment may be treated as made from previously assessed unexplained income, avoiding overlapping additions. Both doctrines are fact specific, applied cautiously, and limited mainly to non genuine entries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:00:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:00:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Peak Credit and telescoping theories in assessment proceedings under Income Tax</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1575</link>
      <description>Peak credit theory allows arranging unexplained credits and debits chronologically and treating later credits as referable to earlier withdrawals so only the peak unexplained amount is assessed; it may extend across accounts if all credits are treated as the assessee&#039;s funds and is rebuttable by material showing withdrawals were sourced elsewhere. Telescoping permits set offs between different types of additions or across years where an unexplained investment may be treated as made from previously assessed unexplained income, avoiding overlapping additions. Both doctrines are fact specific, applied cautiously, and limited mainly to non genuine entries.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:00:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>