<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SPECIAL DRIVE COULD NOT BE A JUSTIFICATION FOR VIOLATION OF NATURAL JUSTICE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1564</link>
    <description>Provisional tax assessments finalized during an administrative &quot;special drive&quot; without affording the assessee a hearing or passing a speaking order were held to violate natural justice; the High Court set aside the communications and assessment orders and directed the adjudicating authority to furnish a reasonable opportunity of being heard and to pass fresh orders complying with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:29:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:29:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SPECIAL DRIVE COULD NOT BE A JUSTIFICATION FOR VIOLATION OF NATURAL JUSTICE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1564</link>
      <description>Provisional tax assessments finalized during an administrative &quot;special drive&quot; without affording the assessee a hearing or passing a speaking order were held to violate natural justice; the High Court set aside the communications and assessment orders and directed the adjudicating authority to furnish a reasonable opportunity of being heard and to pass fresh orders complying with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:29:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>