<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Initial or additional depreciation – 20% need to be allowed in first year to achieve the purpose of incentive. An amendment is desirable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1544</link>
    <description>The document identifies an interpretive conflict between the mandatory grant of an incentive called initial depreciation, which is intended as a one time first year allowance on new eligible plant and machinery, and a proviso that appears to restrict that allowance when an asset is used for fewer days in the acquisition year. It argues that, given the incentive&#039;s purposive objective and mandatory statutory language, the full allowance should be available in the year of acquisition and that the proviso should be amended or removed to avoid litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:02:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:02:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=302023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Initial or additional depreciation – 20% need to be allowed in first year to achieve the purpose of incentive. An amendment is desirable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1544</link>
      <description>The document identifies an interpretive conflict between the mandatory grant of an incentive called initial depreciation, which is intended as a one time first year allowance on new eligible plant and machinery, and a proviso that appears to restrict that allowance when an asset is used for fewer days in the acquisition year. It argues that, given the incentive&#039;s purposive objective and mandatory statutory language, the full allowance should be available in the year of acquisition and that the proviso should be amended or removed to avoid litigation.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:02:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>