https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1528 The court addressed whether a writ challenging an ex parte appellate order imposing a pre-deposit should be entertained when a statutory appellate remedy exists. The petitioner, who paid duty from CENVAT credit, had appeals dismissed for non-compliance with a 50% pre-deposit imposed without notice. Given the availability of the statutory appeal and the running limitation period, the court returned the writ for conversion into the appropriate appellate proceeding to enable the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy and raise issues relating to pre-deposit, CENVAT payment, notice, and fairness. en-us Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:45:42 +0530 Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:45:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1528 The court addressed whether a writ challenging an ex parte appellate order imposing a pre-deposit should be entertained when a statutory appellate remedy exists. The petitioner, who paid duty from CENVAT credit, had appeals dismissed for non-compliance with a 50% pre-deposit imposed without notice. Given the availability of the statutory appeal and the running limitation period, the court returned the writ for conversion into the appropriate appellate proceeding to enable the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy and raise issues relating to pre-deposit, CENVAT payment, notice, and fairness. Articles Central Excise Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:45:42 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1528