<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NO PENALTY IN CASE OF CONTENTIOUS ISSUES.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1412</link>
    <description>Where a duty claim rests on a genuinely contentious interpretational question and the adjudicator records that characterization, penalties for deliberate evasion are inappropriate absent evidence of conscious wrongdoing; assessors should distinguish arguable legal positions from culpable conduct and document technical and legal bases to mitigate penalty exposure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:35:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:35:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NO PENALTY IN CASE OF CONTENTIOUS ISSUES.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1412</link>
      <description>Where a duty claim rests on a genuinely contentious interpretational question and the adjudicator records that characterization, penalties for deliberate evasion are inappropriate absent evidence of conscious wrongdoing; assessors should distinguish arguable legal positions from culpable conduct and document technical and legal bases to mitigate penalty exposure.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:35:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>