<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>HEART – A PLANT?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1400</link>
    <description>The court examined whether coronary surgery expenses qualify as a deductible current repairs cost of a plant or as a business expenditure. It held that a human organ cannot be treated as a business asset on the balance sheet and that medical treatment is inherently personal, lacking the exclusive business-purpose nexus required for deduction; where mixed personal and professional benefit exists, apportionment based on demonstrable business use is the appropriate approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:02:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:32:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>HEART – A PLANT?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1400</link>
      <description>The court examined whether coronary surgery expenses qualify as a deductible current repairs cost of a plant or as a business expenditure. It held that a human organ cannot be treated as a business asset on the balance sheet and that medical treatment is inherently personal, lacking the exclusive business-purpose nexus required for deduction; where mixed personal and professional benefit exists, apportionment based on demonstrable business use is the appropriate approach.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:02:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>