<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Prompt actions instead of delayed one is preferable- learning from a recent ruling of the supreme Court in matter against Chief Justice P. D. Dinakaran.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1363</link>
    <description>The real likelihood test governs disqualification for bias: whether a fair minded, informed person, aware of all facts, would reasonably apprehend lack of impartiality. Prior public statements and participation can give rise to such apprehension, but a belated, knowledgeably silent objection may indicate mala fides and dilatory intent. Where reasonable apprehension is found, replacing the questioned member and allowing the reconstituted Committee to proceed on framed charges balances impartiality with continuity of inquiry. Prompt, well founded action is preferable to avoid suspicions of ulterior motive or delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:56:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:56:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Prompt actions instead of delayed one is preferable- learning from a recent ruling of the supreme Court in matter against Chief Justice P. D. Dinakaran.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1363</link>
      <description>The real likelihood test governs disqualification for bias: whether a fair minded, informed person, aware of all facts, would reasonably apprehend lack of impartiality. Prior public statements and participation can give rise to such apprehension, but a belated, knowledgeably silent objection may indicate mala fides and dilatory intent. Where reasonable apprehension is found, replacing the questioned member and allowing the reconstituted Committee to proceed on framed charges balances impartiality with continuity of inquiry. Prompt, well founded action is preferable to avoid suspicions of ulterior motive or delay.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:56:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>