<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Remand of penalty orders in appeal whether justified?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1246</link>
    <description>Where a penalty order in tax proceedings is arbitrary or afflicted by procedural infirmity-notably absence of inquiry or denial of opportunity to be heard-the order should be quashed rather than remanded to the same penalizing authority, because remand subjects the taxpayer to repeat penal proceedings, hardship and potential double jeopardy, and fails to deliver effective relief under welfare-focused tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:21:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:21:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Remand of penalty orders in appeal whether justified?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1246</link>
      <description>Where a penalty order in tax proceedings is arbitrary or afflicted by procedural infirmity-notably absence of inquiry or denial of opportunity to be heard-the order should be quashed rather than remanded to the same penalizing authority, because remand subjects the taxpayer to repeat penal proceedings, hardship and potential double jeopardy, and fails to deliver effective relief under welfare-focused tax laws.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Value Added Tax - VAT and CST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:21:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>