https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1149 On interlocutory review of petitions alleging oppression and mismanagement, the Board found no prima facie material of complicity by the auditor or company secretary and observed that alleged professional misconduct is not ordinarily for preliminary examination by the Company Law Board; thus the particulars relied on by petitioners were insufficient to render these independent professionals necessary parties to the corporate disputes, with any examination of professional conduct to be pursued through other remedial channels. en-us Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:13:51 +0530 Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:13:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1149 On interlocutory review of petitions alleging oppression and mismanagement, the Board found no prima facie material of complicity by the auditor or company secretary and observed that alleged professional misconduct is not ordinarily for preliminary examination by the Company Law Board; thus the particulars relied on by petitioners were insufficient to render these independent professionals necessary parties to the corporate disputes, with any examination of professional conduct to be pursued through other remedial channels. Articles Other Topics Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:13:51 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1149