https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1114 The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 provides a self-contained remedial scheme and an effective alternative remedy by way of statutory appeal; writ jurisdiction is ordinarily inappropriate where that appeal lies. In the reported matter a petition under Article 227 was entertained while the statutory appeal was pending, which the Supreme Court found to be an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction. The Court also held that dismissal of the complainant's recall application was vitiated for failing to examine uncontested reasons for nonappearance, and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication. en-us Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:54:39 +0530 Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:54:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1114 The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 provides a self-contained remedial scheme and an effective alternative remedy by way of statutory appeal; writ jurisdiction is ordinarily inappropriate where that appeal lies. In the reported matter a petition under Article 227 was entertained while the statutory appeal was pending, which the Supreme Court found to be an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction. The Court also held that dismissal of the complainant's recall application was vitiated for failing to examine uncontested reasons for nonappearance, and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication. Articles Other Topics Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:54:39 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1114