<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TRIBUNAL HAS NO POWER TO REVERSE A DECISION ON MERITS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1101</link>
    <description>Tribunal rectification under Section 254(2) is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to readjudicate contested issues or reverse an order on its merits; inherent or incidental powers and the principle actus curiae neminem gravabit do not authorise rehearing of the merits, and a second rectification application cannot serve as a vehicle for reconsideration when the same points were earlier dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:05:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:40:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>TRIBUNAL HAS NO POWER TO REVERSE A DECISION ON MERITS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1101</link>
      <description>Tribunal rectification under Section 254(2) is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to readjudicate contested issues or reverse an order on its merits; inherent or incidental powers and the principle actus curiae neminem gravabit do not authorise rehearing of the merits, and a second rectification application cannot serve as a vehicle for reconsideration when the same points were earlier dismissed.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:05:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>