<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Third Innings: Section 4A v/s Section 4 - MRP Based Valuation</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1090</link>
    <description>Section 4A mandates MRP based valuation only where goods are statutorily required to bear retail sale price and notified for such valuation; Rule 34(b) exempts retail units below a prescribed small-quantity limit, and wholesale packages containing individually exempt-weight retail pieces do not attract Section 4A, a position affirmed by the Supreme Court which supersedes contrary tribunal larger-bench findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:19:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:11:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Third Innings: Section 4A v/s Section 4 - MRP Based Valuation</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1090</link>
      <description>Section 4A mandates MRP based valuation only where goods are statutorily required to bear retail sale price and notified for such valuation; Rule 34(b) exempts retail units below a prescribed small-quantity limit, and wholesale packages containing individually exempt-weight retail pieces do not attract Section 4A, a position affirmed by the Supreme Court which supersedes contrary tribunal larger-bench findings.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:19:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=1090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>