<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>MAT: ITAT holding MAT not applicable to Banking Company which is not required to prepare profit and loss account as per Schedule VI to the Companies Act. With respect the author has reasons to differ.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=984</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that Minimum Alternate Tax under Section 115JB operates from the result shown by a profit and loss account prepared in accordance with Parts II and III of Schedule VI, and that banking companies exempted from Schedule VI by the proviso to Section 211(2) prepare accounts under the Banking Regulation Act; consequently, the tribunal treated the MAT provisions as inapplicable to the assessee bank and found the reassessment initiated solely for imposing MAT to be legally unsupported.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:43:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>MAT: ITAT holding MAT not applicable to Banking Company which is not required to prepare profit and loss account as per Schedule VI to the Companies Act. With respect the author has reasons to differ.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=984</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that Minimum Alternate Tax under Section 115JB operates from the result shown by a profit and loss account prepared in accordance with Parts II and III of Schedule VI, and that banking companies exempted from Schedule VI by the proviso to Section 211(2) prepare accounts under the Banking Regulation Act; consequently, the tribunal treated the MAT provisions as inapplicable to the assessee bank and found the reassessment initiated solely for imposing MAT to be legally unsupported.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>