<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>WHAT CONSTITUTES CONTEMPT OF COURT - (An analysis of SC Judgment in case of RK Jain)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=912</link>
    <description>Bonafide criticism of a judicial or quasi judicial institution is not contempt unless shown to be motivated by malafide design or deliberate misrepresentation; truthful statements material to the issue and opinions expressed in the public interest constitute a valid defence, while deliberate distortion or scandalous allegations unrelated to the matter remain unprotected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:01:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:02:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>WHAT CONSTITUTES CONTEMPT OF COURT - (An analysis of SC Judgment in case of RK Jain)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=912</link>
      <description>Bonafide criticism of a judicial or quasi judicial institution is not contempt unless shown to be motivated by malafide design or deliberate misrepresentation; truthful statements material to the issue and opinions expressed in the public interest constitute a valid defence, while deliberate distortion or scandalous allegations unrelated to the matter remain unprotected.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:01:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>