<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TOUR OPERATOR- MATTER RESTORED BY THE SUPPREME COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=872</link>
    <description>The document distinguishes tour operator services from mere transport provision, holding that vehicles must be registered and operated as tourist vehicles under the Motor Vehicles Act and Rule 128 for tour operator service tax to apply. Factual findings-whether trips are &quot;tours&quot;, passengers are &quot;tourists&quot;, and vehicles are used as tourist vehicles-determine taxability; routine employee, student, or local commutes typically do not qualify as tour operator services. The Supreme Court remitted the matter for fresh consideration because the High Court did not examine these factual and common sense aspects sufficiently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>TOUR OPERATOR- MATTER RESTORED BY THE SUPPREME COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=872</link>
      <description>The document distinguishes tour operator services from mere transport provision, holding that vehicles must be registered and operated as tourist vehicles under the Motor Vehicles Act and Rule 128 for tour operator service tax to apply. Factual findings-whether trips are &quot;tours&quot;, passengers are &quot;tourists&quot;, and vehicles are used as tourist vehicles-determine taxability; routine employee, student, or local commutes typically do not qualify as tour operator services. The Supreme Court remitted the matter for fresh consideration because the High Court did not examine these factual and common sense aspects sufficiently.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>