<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Packing the dispute of branded goods on packing material</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=815</link>
    <description>Notification exclusions denied SSI exemption where specified goods bore another person&#039;s brand, but successive amendments and board actions expanded the listed packing materials eligible for exemption and granted retrospective relief for specified items. A later substitution broadened the rule to exempt all packing materials meant for use as packing material by or on behalf of the person whose brand they bear, extending SSI relief to packing materials bearing another&#039;s brand while administrative enforcement and demands prompted repeated industry representations and calls for further retrospective and category-wide clarifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 10:16:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Packing the dispute of branded goods on packing material</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=815</link>
      <description>Notification exclusions denied SSI exemption where specified goods bore another person&#039;s brand, but successive amendments and board actions expanded the listed packing materials eligible for exemption and granted retrospective relief for specified items. A later substitution broadened the rule to exempt all packing materials meant for use as packing material by or on behalf of the person whose brand they bear, extending SSI relief to packing materials bearing another&#039;s brand while administrative enforcement and demands prompted repeated industry representations and calls for further retrospective and category-wide clarifications.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 10:16:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>