<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>IF THE TRIBUNAL WANTS TO DIFFER TO THE EARLIER VIEW TAKEN BY THE TRIBUNAL IN THE IDENTICAL SET OF FACTS THE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE REQUIRES REFERENCE TO THE LARGER BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=779</link>
    <description>The note stresses that when a tribunal or judge proposes to depart from a prior co ordinate-bench decision on identical facts, judicial discipline requires referring the matter to a larger bench; applied to valuation disputes, it notes that charges for freight and transit insurance were excluded from assessable value where removal is at the factory gate, and criticises a subsequent tribunal decision that declined to follow the earlier co ordinate view without a reference, warning that such divergence undermines legal certainty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:10:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>IF THE TRIBUNAL WANTS TO DIFFER TO THE EARLIER VIEW TAKEN BY THE TRIBUNAL IN THE IDENTICAL SET OF FACTS THE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE REQUIRES REFERENCE TO THE LARGER BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=779</link>
      <description>The note stresses that when a tribunal or judge proposes to depart from a prior co ordinate-bench decision on identical facts, judicial discipline requires referring the matter to a larger bench; applied to valuation disputes, it notes that charges for freight and transit insurance were excluded from assessable value where removal is at the factory gate, and criticises a subsequent tribunal decision that declined to follow the earlier co ordinate view without a reference, warning that such divergence undermines legal certainty.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>