<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>WHY TO WASTE VALUABE TIME OF CBDT AND TAXPAYERS AND PRACTIONERS? - THERE APPEARS NO CHAGE IN THE NEW RULE 30 OF INCOME TAX RULES RELATIG TO PAYMENT OF TDS.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=769</link>
    <description>The substitution of Rule 30 for payment of tax deducted at source reproduces existing timelines and remittance procedures: government deductions on the same day, other deductions within one week or within two months where accounts closure triggers a different timeline, permissive quarterly payment subject to approval, and remittance into authorised banks accompanied by an income tax challan (except for government deductions). The 2010 rule mirrors a 2009 substitution kept in abeyance and does not introduce substantive procedural changes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:24:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>WHY TO WASTE VALUABE TIME OF CBDT AND TAXPAYERS AND PRACTIONERS? - THERE APPEARS NO CHAGE IN THE NEW RULE 30 OF INCOME TAX RULES RELATIG TO PAYMENT OF TDS.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=769</link>
      <description>The substitution of Rule 30 for payment of tax deducted at source reproduces existing timelines and remittance procedures: government deductions on the same day, other deductions within one week or within two months where accounts closure triggers a different timeline, permissive quarterly payment subject to approval, and remittance into authorised banks accompanied by an income tax challan (except for government deductions). The 2010 rule mirrors a 2009 substitution kept in abeyance and does not introduce substantive procedural changes.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>