<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 40(a)(ia)- apparently a weakly represented case in DEY&#039;S MEDICAL (U.P.) P. LTD. Vs.UOI 2009 -TMI - 35099 - [2009] 316 ITR 445 (All).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=757</link>
    <description>TDS-driven disallowance conditions the deductibility of specified resident payments on timely deduction and deposit of tax at source; distinct deadlines apply to amounts deducted in the last month of the previous year versus earlier months, with a safeguard that the expenditure becomes deductible in the year in which the tax is actually deducted and deposited. The rule operates notwithstanding other allowance provisions, raises practical distortions by shifting income between years where deposit timing is not met, and attracts litigation where deductibility itself is disputed or where constitutional and proportionality objections are raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:08:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 40(a)(ia)- apparently a weakly represented case in DEY&#039;S MEDICAL (U.P.) P. LTD. Vs.UOI 2009 -TMI - 35099 - [2009] 316 ITR 445 (All).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=757</link>
      <description>TDS-driven disallowance conditions the deductibility of specified resident payments on timely deduction and deposit of tax at source; distinct deadlines apply to amounts deducted in the last month of the previous year versus earlier months, with a safeguard that the expenditure becomes deductible in the year in which the tax is actually deducted and deposited. The rule operates notwithstanding other allowance provisions, raises practical distortions by shifting income between years where deposit timing is not met, and attracts litigation where deductibility itself is disputed or where constitutional and proportionality objections are raised.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>