<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Budget 2010 - SECTION 56 :- DEEMED INCOME BY WAY OF GIFTS OF IMMOVABLE PROPETY - is something missing in budget proposals about inadequate consideration?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=756</link>
    <description>The Finance Bill 2010 narrows the deeming provision so that immovable property received only without consideration is chargeable, and limits &quot;property&quot; to capital assets, excluding stock-in-trade; stamp duty value remains the valuation touchstone with dispute referral to a Valuation Officer. The change, retrospective to the original provision, removes coverage of transactions for inadequate consideration, creating a drafting gap whereby artificially low stated consideration may escape the deeming charge contrary to the anti-evasion intent of the original rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:00:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Budget 2010 - SECTION 56 :- DEEMED INCOME BY WAY OF GIFTS OF IMMOVABLE PROPETY - is something missing in budget proposals about inadequate consideration?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=756</link>
      <description>The Finance Bill 2010 narrows the deeming provision so that immovable property received only without consideration is chargeable, and limits &quot;property&quot; to capital assets, excluding stock-in-trade; stamp duty value remains the valuation touchstone with dispute referral to a Valuation Officer. The change, retrospective to the original provision, removes coverage of transactions for inadequate consideration, creating a drafting gap whereby artificially low stated consideration may escape the deeming charge contrary to the anti-evasion intent of the original rule.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>