<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Payments made to co-operative societies for procuring paddy is not subject to S. 40A (3) an analysis of recent order of Calcutta high Court and alternate plea suggested by author. - Section 40A(3) does not serve its purpose-some suggestions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=534</link>
    <description>Payments in cash to entities classifiable as primary agricultural credit societies are exempt from the disallowance under section 40A(3) by virtue of Rule 6DD; alternatively, where payments are effectively to cultivators, growers or producers (or their agents such as producer co operative societies), clause (e) of Rule 6DD may justify exemption. The Calcutta High Court summarily dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal after the Tribunal accepted the exemption, though the court&#039;s order leaves some ambiguity whether the payees were credit societies or producer co-operative societies. The author contends that disallowing recorded cash payments does not effectively check tax evasion and recommends targeting recipients for assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:34:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Payments made to co-operative societies for procuring paddy is not subject to S. 40A (3) an analysis of recent order of Calcutta high Court and alternate plea suggested by author. - Section 40A(3) does not serve its purpose-some suggestions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=534</link>
      <description>Payments in cash to entities classifiable as primary agricultural credit societies are exempt from the disallowance under section 40A(3) by virtue of Rule 6DD; alternatively, where payments are effectively to cultivators, growers or producers (or their agents such as producer co operative societies), clause (e) of Rule 6DD may justify exemption. The Calcutta High Court summarily dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal after the Tribunal accepted the exemption, though the court&#039;s order leaves some ambiguity whether the payees were credit societies or producer co-operative societies. The author contends that disallowing recorded cash payments does not effectively check tax evasion and recommends targeting recipients for assessment.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>