<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Learning from judgment in the case of Moser Baer India Ltd - the case must be prepared on facts, and should not rely merely on technical issues.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=527</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that penalties for concealment may be levied even when an assessee shows an assessed loss, and remitted unresolved questions of whether deductions were bona fide or amounted to concealment to the Tribunal for factual determination. The decision warns against relying solely on technical defences because subsequent larger bench rulings and legislative deeming provisions can alter liability; litigants should therefore build cases on factual merits, multiple legal grounds, and seek full factual examination rather than limited technical dispositions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:02:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Learning from judgment in the case of Moser Baer India Ltd - the case must be prepared on facts, and should not rely merely on technical issues.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=527</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that penalties for concealment may be levied even when an assessee shows an assessed loss, and remitted unresolved questions of whether deductions were bona fide or amounted to concealment to the Tribunal for factual determination. The decision warns against relying solely on technical defences because subsequent larger bench rulings and legislative deeming provisions can alter liability; litigants should therefore build cases on factual merits, multiple legal grounds, and seek full factual examination rather than limited technical dispositions.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>